Skip to main content

A $16 billion OpenAI and Oracle data center could decide whether Michigan power bills go up or stay put [Business Insider]

When OpenAI and Oracle announced their $16 billion “Stargate” data center project in Michigan last year, the economic development folks cheered. Thousands of construction jobs, hundreds of permanent tech positions, and a massive tax revenue boost for the state. But behind the ribbon-cutting hype, there’s a much quieter, more consequential question that will affect every household and small business in the state: Who pays for the electricity to run it?

The power-hungry reality of AI data centers

Let’s be blunt: A data center of this scale is a power glutton. The proposed facility, located on a sprawling site near Grand Rapids, is expected to draw between 300 and 500 megawatts of electricity at peak operation. To put that in perspective, that’s roughly the equivalent of powering 200,000 to 300,000 homes. For a single building. That kind of load doesn’t just plug into the grid like a toaster. It requires dedicated substations, new transmission lines, and a guaranteed supply of baseload power—preferably around the clock, because AI training servers don’t sleep.

That’s where the trouble starts. Michigan’s largest utility, DTE Energy, and Consumers Energy are already navigating a tricky transition away from coal while trying to keep rates stable. They’ve both filed integrated resource plans that show rising demand from industrial and data center customers. But here’s the core tension: If the grid has to be beefed up to serve a $16 billion customer, the cost of that infrastructure gets spread across all ratepayers unless regulators step in.

The “load growth” math that keeps utility CEOs up at night

Utility companies are regulated monopolies. They make money by building infrastructure and earning a guaranteed return on that investment. So when a massive data center shows up and says, “We need 400 megawatts,” the utility’s natural instinct is to build new power plants, substations, and lines. That’s good for their shareholders. But unless the data center agrees to pay for 100% of those upgrades upfront—which most don’t—the cost gets socialized into everyone else’s monthly bill.

Michigan’s Public Service Commission has seen this movie before. In 2023, they approved a rate increase for DTE that included $2.5 billion in grid upgrades, partly tied to anticipated industrial growth. But critics argued that the average residential customer was essentially subsidizing infrastructure for big corporate users. The OpenAI-Oracle project amplifies that concern tenfold. If the data center’s power demand is treated as “general load,” residential and small business customers could see their rates rise by 5% to 10% over the next decade, according to some utility analysts I’ve spoken with—even if they never touch an AI model.

OpenAI and Oracle’s incentive package: the fine print

To land the project, Michigan offered a $1.2 billion tax break package under the state’s Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve (SOAR) fund. That’s on top of local property tax abatements. The deal includes performance benchmarks, but it doesn’t explicitly cap the data center’s energy costs to ratepayers. In a press release, Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s office emphasized that the project would create 2,000 construction jobs and 500 permanent positions, with an average salary of $110,000. But when I asked about the electricity cost allocation, a spokesperson said the state “expects the utility and the company to negotiate a fair tariff under existing commission rules.”

That’s the regulatory equivalent of “we’ll figure it out later.” And later is now.

The counterargument: why this could actually lower your bill

Not everyone sees doom and gloom. Supporters of the project argue that large industrial customers often bring down costs for everyone because they provide a stable, high-volume revenue stream that allows utilities to spread fixed costs over a larger base. In theory, if the data center pays a tariff that covers its full marginal cost plus a contribution to existing infrastructure, residential rates could stay flat or even decrease slightly. DTE Energy, in its public comments, has pointed to its “large customer tariff” structure, which requires big users to pay for transmission and distribution upgrades they necessitate.

The key variable is whether the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) enforces that rule rigorously. Historically, commission staff have approved special contracts for large industrial customers that included discounted rates in exchange for job creation and investment. That practice—called economic development rates—exists in many states. But those discounts can shift costs to other ratepayers. A 2022 study by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance found that special industrial rates in Michigan resulted in residential customers paying about $50 more per year than they would under a pure cost-of-service model.

What’s at stake for your monthly power bill

Let’s do the back-of-the-envelope math. The average Michigan household pays about $1,200 per year for electricity, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. If the data center’s grid upgrades add 2% to the utility’s rate base, that’s roughly $24 per year per household. If it’s 5%, that’s $60. And if the data center gets a sweetheart deal that shifts 10% of its costs to residential customers, you’re looking at $120 more annually. For low-income families, that’s a real hit.

Now, the project could also create enough economic activity—more jobs, higher property values, increased tax revenue—to offset those costs. But that’s a long-term bet. In the short term, the MPSC will decide this year whether to approve DTE’s updated rate case, which includes $1.8 billion in new infrastructure partly driven by the data center demand. The hearings start in June, and consumer advocates have already filed interventions.

The bottom line: a test case for AI’s energy footprint

This isn’t just a Michigan story. AI data centers are popping up everywhere—Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Arizona. Every state is grappling with the same question: How do you attract billion-dollar tech investments without sticking residents with the tab? Michigan’s decision on the OpenAI-Oracle project will set a precedent for how the country balances the AI boom with affordable power. If the commission holds the line and makes the data center pay its fair share, it could become a model for other states. If it caves to corporate pressure, your next power bill increase might have a very clear cause.

So keep an eye on Lansing. The debate over electric rates rarely makes headlines, but this one could decide whether your lights stay on—and what they cost.

Ahmed Abed – News journalist

Latest

What SaaSpocalypse? Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9 stocks soar as their AI moves deliver earnings beats [Business Insider]

In a tech landscape often painted with broad strokes of doom and gloom over software-as-a-service (SaaS) valuations, a trio of enterprise stalwarts just flipped the script. Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9—three companies that have weathered their fair share of market skepticism—delivered earnings beats that sent their stocks soaring this week. The common thread? A sharp pivot toward artificial intelligence that isn't just a buzzword in a press release, but a tangible driver of customer uptake and revenue growth. Forget the "SaaSpocalypse" narrative for a moment; these results suggest that AI might just be the lifeline the sector needed. Atlassian: The DevOps Darling Gets an AI Upgrade Atlassian, the company behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello, has long been the backbone of developer workflows. But its latest earnings report, released late Wednesday, showed that the company is successfully moving beyond its traditional "self-managed" roots into a cloud-first, AI-...
Read more

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...
Read more

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...
Read more

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...
Read more

Jensen Huang is so over the dire predictions of AI leaders like Dario Amodei [Business Insider]

If you’ve spent any time in the tech press over the last six months, you’ve probably seen the headlines. “AI could kill us all.” “The risk of extinction is real.” “We need to pause development.” These warnings, often delivered with the gravitas of a late-night public service announcement, have become a staple of the industry’s public relations diet. The man leading the charge? Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, who has made a second career out of predicting the worst-case scenario for the very technology he is building. But there is another voice in the room, and it isn’t whispering. It’s Jensen Huang, the leather-jacket-clad CEO of Nvidia. And lately, he’s had enough of the doomsday rhetoric. In a series of recent interviews and public appearances, Huang has made it abundantly clear that he is “so over” the dire predictions coming from his fellow AI leaders. He isn’t just disagreeing with them; he’s rolling his eyes in a way that only a man who has seen two decades of tech cycles can. ...
Read more

We sold our dream home in the US to move into a rental abroad. Our family has less space, but our lifestyle improved. [Business Insider]

It was the kind of house you see in a real estate catalog and immediately assume belongs to someone else’s life. Four bedrooms, a sprawling backyard with a swing set, a kitchen island big enough to host Thanksgiving dinner, and a mortgage that felt like a second job. My wife, Maria, and I spent five years curating that home. We painted the nursery ourselves, planted the magnolia tree by the driveway, and replaced the carpet with hardwood floors because we believed we were building a legacy. We sold it last spring. Not because we had to. Not because we lost our jobs or fell into debt. We sold it because we realized the house was eating us alive—not financially, but emotionally. We were spending more time maintaining the lawn than lying on it. More weekends fixing the gutters than exploring the city. More energy worrying about resale value than actually living. So we did something that felt terrifying at first, then liberating: we packed two suitcases each, put the rest in storage, a...
Read more

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...
Read more

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. [Business Insider]

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. OMAHA, Neb. — I have been covering Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder weekend for six years. I thought I had seen every trick the Oracle of Omaha pulls out of his sleeve. I was wrong. This year, the main event was scheduled to be a standard Q&A with Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a few portfolio managers. The official program listed no appearance by 94-year-old Warren Buffett. Most of us expected him to skip the stage, perhaps sending a video message from his home in Omaha. The whispers in the media center were polite but resigned: *He’s getting older. This is the transition.* Then, at 9:47 a.m. local time, something changed. I was sitting in the third row of the press section, laptop open, coffee lukewarm, when a Berkshire PR staffer walked on stage, leaned toward Greg Abel, and whispered something. Abel nodded, stood ...
Read more

After my divorce, I dreaded any type of holiday alone. A group of friends changed that. [Business Insider]

For years, the word “holiday” felt like a trap. After my divorce, the idea of booking a trip alone sent a cold knot into my stomach. It wasn’t the logistics that scared me—I could plan a flight and book a hotel in my sleep. It was the silence. The empty seat next to me at dinner. The awkward look from a waiter when they asked, “Table for one?” I spent two years convincing myself that solo travel was for the brave, and I was not that. I was the guy who stayed home, watching travel documentaries and eating cereal for dinner. Then, something unexpected happened. A group of friends—not close friends, more like familiar faces from a shared hobby—invited me on a long weekend trip to the coast. At first, I said no. The thought of being the “divorced guy” in a group of couples and singles felt like a social minefield. But one of them, a woman named Sarah I barely knew, called me out. “You’re not hiding forever,” she said, half-joking. “Pack a bag. We’ll handle the awkwardness.” I packed that...
Read more

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...
Read more