A $16 billion OpenAI and Oracle data center could decide whether Michigan power bills go up or stay put [Business Insider] Skip to main content

A $16 billion OpenAI and Oracle data center could decide whether Michigan power bills go up or stay put [Business Insider]

When OpenAI and Oracle announced their $16 billion “Stargate” data center project in Michigan last year, the economic development folks cheered. Thousands of construction jobs, hundreds of permanent tech positions, and a massive tax revenue boost for the state. But behind the ribbon-cutting hype, there’s a much quieter, more consequential question that will affect every household and small business in the state: Who pays for the electricity to run it?

The power-hungry reality of AI data centers

Let’s be blunt: A data center of this scale is a power glutton. The proposed facility, located on a sprawling site near Grand Rapids, is expected to draw between 300 and 500 megawatts of electricity at peak operation. To put that in perspective, that’s roughly the equivalent of powering 200,000 to 300,000 homes. For a single building. That kind of load doesn’t just plug into the grid like a toaster. It requires dedicated substations, new transmission lines, and a guaranteed supply of baseload power—preferably around the clock, because AI training servers don’t sleep.

That’s where the trouble starts. Michigan’s largest utility, DTE Energy, and Consumers Energy are already navigating a tricky transition away from coal while trying to keep rates stable. They’ve both filed integrated resource plans that show rising demand from industrial and data center customers. But here’s the core tension: If the grid has to be beefed up to serve a $16 billion customer, the cost of that infrastructure gets spread across all ratepayers unless regulators step in.

The “load growth” math that keeps utility CEOs up at night

Utility companies are regulated monopolies. They make money by building infrastructure and earning a guaranteed return on that investment. So when a massive data center shows up and says, “We need 400 megawatts,” the utility’s natural instinct is to build new power plants, substations, and lines. That’s good for their shareholders. But unless the data center agrees to pay for 100% of those upgrades upfront—which most don’t—the cost gets socialized into everyone else’s monthly bill.

Michigan’s Public Service Commission has seen this movie before. In 2023, they approved a rate increase for DTE that included $2.5 billion in grid upgrades, partly tied to anticipated industrial growth. But critics argued that the average residential customer was essentially subsidizing infrastructure for big corporate users. The OpenAI-Oracle project amplifies that concern tenfold. If the data center’s power demand is treated as “general load,” residential and small business customers could see their rates rise by 5% to 10% over the next decade, according to some utility analysts I’ve spoken with—even if they never touch an AI model.

OpenAI and Oracle’s incentive package: the fine print

To land the project, Michigan offered a $1.2 billion tax break package under the state’s Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve (SOAR) fund. That’s on top of local property tax abatements. The deal includes performance benchmarks, but it doesn’t explicitly cap the data center’s energy costs to ratepayers. In a press release, Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s office emphasized that the project would create 2,000 construction jobs and 500 permanent positions, with an average salary of $110,000. But when I asked about the electricity cost allocation, a spokesperson said the state “expects the utility and the company to negotiate a fair tariff under existing commission rules.”

That’s the regulatory equivalent of “we’ll figure it out later.” And later is now.

The counterargument: why this could actually lower your bill

Not everyone sees doom and gloom. Supporters of the project argue that large industrial customers often bring down costs for everyone because they provide a stable, high-volume revenue stream that allows utilities to spread fixed costs over a larger base. In theory, if the data center pays a tariff that covers its full marginal cost plus a contribution to existing infrastructure, residential rates could stay flat or even decrease slightly. DTE Energy, in its public comments, has pointed to its “large customer tariff” structure, which requires big users to pay for transmission and distribution upgrades they necessitate.

The key variable is whether the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) enforces that rule rigorously. Historically, commission staff have approved special contracts for large industrial customers that included discounted rates in exchange for job creation and investment. That practice—called economic development rates—exists in many states. But those discounts can shift costs to other ratepayers. A 2022 study by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance found that special industrial rates in Michigan resulted in residential customers paying about $50 more per year than they would under a pure cost-of-service model.

What’s at stake for your monthly power bill

Let’s do the back-of-the-envelope math. The average Michigan household pays about $1,200 per year for electricity, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. If the data center’s grid upgrades add 2% to the utility’s rate base, that’s roughly $24 per year per household. If it’s 5%, that’s $60. And if the data center gets a sweetheart deal that shifts 10% of its costs to residential customers, you’re looking at $120 more annually. For low-income families, that’s a real hit.

Now, the project could also create enough economic activity—more jobs, higher property values, increased tax revenue—to offset those costs. But that’s a long-term bet. In the short term, the MPSC will decide this year whether to approve DTE’s updated rate case, which includes $1.8 billion in new infrastructure partly driven by the data center demand. The hearings start in June, and consumer advocates have already filed interventions.

The bottom line: a test case for AI’s energy footprint

This isn’t just a Michigan story. AI data centers are popping up everywhere—Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Arizona. Every state is grappling with the same question: How do you attract billion-dollar tech investments without sticking residents with the tab? Michigan’s decision on the OpenAI-Oracle project will set a precedent for how the country balances the AI boom with affordable power. If the commission holds the line and makes the data center pay its fair share, it could become a model for other states. If it caves to corporate pressure, your next power bill increase might have a very clear cause.

So keep an eye on Lansing. The debate over electric rates rarely makes headlines, but this one could decide whether your lights stay on—and what they cost.

Ahmed Abed – News journalist

Latest

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...
Read more

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...
Read more

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...
Read more

After NASCAR's Greg Biffle and family died, police now think 'friends' stole from them

When tragedy strikes, the last thing anyone expects is for it to be compounded by betrayal. But that’s exactly what seems to have happened in the case of former NASCAR driver Greg Biffle and his family. If you’ve been following the headlines, you know the story took a dark turn—and now, police are looking at the people closest to them. Let’s rewind a bit. Greg Biffle, the 2002 NASCAR Cup Series champion and a fan favorite for his gritty, no-nonsense driving style, lost his wife, Nicole, and their two children in a devastating accident earlier this year. The news hit the racing world like a punch to the gut. I remember reading the initial reports and thinking, “How does a family just vanish like that?” The answer, as we later learned, was a fiery crash that left no survivors. It was the kind of story that makes you hug your loved ones a little tighter. But here’s where it gets ugly. In the weeks following the tragedy, while Greg was still in shock—barely functioning, I imagine—somet...
Read more

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...
Read more

Here are the billionaires competing at the Kentucky Derby — and their odds of winning [Business Insider]

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist LOUISVILLE, Ky. — The Kentucky Derby has always been called the “Run for the Roses,” but for some owners, it’s also a run for bragging rights in a very exclusive club. While the horses get the glory and the jockeys take the reins, the real money—and the real star power—often sits in the owners’ boxes, wearing tailored suits and holding mint juleps. This year, the field at Churchill Downs is especially glittering. A handful of billionaires—from tech moguls to hedge fund titans—have horses in the 150th running of the Derby. Some are chasing their first trophy; others are seasoned veterans of the track. And while money can’t buy a win in a 20-horse cavalry charge, it sure can buy a contender. Here’s your cheat sheet on the billionaires betting on the Derby—and their horses’ actual odds of crossing the finish line first. 1. Barry Bonds? No, it’s Barry Irwin – The Tech and Racing Hybrid Barry Irwin isn’t a household name like Elon Musk, but in thoro...
Read more

Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks You know how these geopolitical standoffs go. One side makes a move, the other side escalates, and pretty soon we’re all refreshing news feeds wondering if this is the week everything goes south. That’s where we are right now with Iran and the United States. Tehran just dropped a statement that’s hard to ignore. Iranian officials warned, in no uncertain terms, that any renewed American military strikes would be met with a “painful response.” Not a measured one. Not a diplomatic note. A painful one. That word choice matters. Let’s be honest—this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this kind of language. Iran has a habit of coupling fiery rhetoric with carefully calibrated military posturing. But what’s different this time? The context. The US has been ramping up pressure in the region, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz and in response to perceived Iranian drone activities. And Iran? It feels...
Read more

Ukraine strikes Russian port of Tuapse again as environment crisis deepens

It’s hard to keep up with the news from Ukraine these days. Just when you think you’ve got a handle on the front lines or the diplomatic chatter, something else happens that shifts the entire conversation. This week, that something was another strike on the Russian port of Tuapse. And here’s the thing—it’s not just about another explosion. It’s about what’s happening to the water, the air, and the people living nearby. Let’s talk about what’s actually going on. Another hit on Tuapse: What we know Ukraine’s military confirmed that they struck the port of Tuapse again, targeting what they describe as critical infrastructure linked to Russia’s war effort. This isn’t the first time. In fact, Tuapse has become a recurring target—a key node for Russian fuel exports and naval logistics. But this latest attack feels different. Why? Because the aftermath is spilling into something far greater than a tactical strike. Reports from the ground are messy, as they always are in war zones. Local...
Read more

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. [Business Insider]

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. OMAHA, Neb. — I have been covering Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder weekend for six years. I thought I had seen every trick the Oracle of Omaha pulls out of his sleeve. I was wrong. This year, the main event was scheduled to be a standard Q&A with Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a few portfolio managers. The official program listed no appearance by 94-year-old Warren Buffett. Most of us expected him to skip the stage, perhaps sending a video message from his home in Omaha. The whispers in the media center were polite but resigned: *He’s getting older. This is the transition.* Then, at 9:47 a.m. local time, something changed. I was sitting in the third row of the press section, laptop open, coffee lukewarm, when a Berkshire PR staffer walked on stage, leaned toward Greg Abel, and whispered something. Abel nodded, stood ...
Read more

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...
Read more