Skip to main content

Meta earnings updates: Stock drops 5% as company expects to increase capex spending [Business Insider]

Wall Street wasn’t feeling the love for Mark Zuckerberg’s latest spending plans. Meta Platforms Inc. saw its stock slide more than 5% in after-hours trading Wednesday, even as the company reported earnings that beat analyst expectations. The culprit? A massive jump in capital expenditures—capex, in the jargon—that has investors worried about how much the social media giant is willing to bet on its long-term vision.

The numbers were solid enough on the surface. Meta posted earnings per share of $5.04, topping the $4.91 consensus estimate, with revenue hitting $40.1 billion versus the expected $39.2 billion. That’s a 21% year-over-year jump in revenue, driven by a strong advertising business that continues to benefit from its AI-powered targeting tools. But if you think those are headline-grabbing stats, the capex figure was the real showstopper.

Meta’s capex: A spending spree with AI at the center

Meta guided for 2025 capital expenditures in the range of $60 billion to $65 billion, up sharply from the $37 billion to $40 billion range it had projected for 2024. That’s a 50%-plus increase at the midpoint, and it caught a lot of analysts off guard. The company is pouring money into data centers, custom silicon, and infrastructure to power its artificial intelligence initiatives—including the ambitious open-source Llama model and the AI-powered assistant rolling out across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

“We expect that our infrastructure costs will increase meaningfully in 2025 as we continue to invest in the capacity needed to support our AI products,” the company said in its shareholder letter. “We believe the investments we are making today will be key to delivering better experiences for users and advertisers, and to generating returns over the long term.”

The market’s reaction was swift. Meta shares fell from their regular-session close of $582.77 to around $553 in extended trading. The 5% drop erased roughly $70 billion in market capitalization—a steep price for a company that just beat on earnings. But investors have been here before. Meta’s stock has a history of volatility around capex announcements, especially when the spending is tied to unproven technologies like the metaverse (remember the $10 billion-plus quarterly losses at Reality Labs?).

Revenue growth is strong, but costs are climbing

It’s not as if Meta is ignoring its core business. The family of apps—Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger—saw daily active users hit 3.29 billion in the fourth quarter, up 4% from a year ago. Advertising revenue remains the cash cow, with the company’s AI tools helping brands target users more effectively and boosting ad pricing. But the cost side of the ledger is where the tension lives.

Total costs and expenses for 2024 came in at $96.6 billion, and the company expects that to rise to $114 billion to $119 billion in 2025. The biggest driver is infrastructure-related costs, including depreciation and operating expenses for new data centers. Meta also said it expects “significant” hiring in AI-related roles, which adds to the wage bill.

There’s also the shadow of Reality Labs, Meta’s augmented and virtual reality division, which lost another $4.5 billion in the quarter. For the full year, the unit burned through $17.7 billion. Zuckerberg remains committed to the long-term vision of a mixed-reality future, but for now, it’s a drag on margins. The company’s operating margin narrowed to 42% in the fourth quarter, down from 44% a year earlier, a sign that the spending arc is bending upward faster than revenue can keep pace.

Why investors are nervous—but not panicking

So why did the stock drop? Because the market hates surprise spending, even when the rationale is solid. Meta’s capex guidance was higher than the $58 billion to $60 billion many analysts had penciled in. And there’s a lingering fear that AI infrastructure could become a “capital-intensive arms race” with no clear near-term payoff. Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are all ramping up their own AI spending, and Meta is trying to stay competitive without the same cloud revenue cushion.

But here’s the nuance: Meta’s balance sheet is strong. The company ended the year with $77 billion in cash and marketable securities, and it generated $65 billion in free cash flow in 2024. That gives it plenty of room to invest. The question is whether investors have the patience to wait for returns. Zuckerberg has been explicit that it could take years for AI investments to meaningfully boost revenue, and that’s a tough sell in a market that rewards short-term wins.

“We’re in a period of heavy investment, and I think it’s the right thing to do strategically,” Zuckerberg said on the earnings call. “But I also understand why it creates near-term uncertainty for the stock.” The CEO’s tone was confident, but not dismissive of the risks. He noted that Meta is already seeing early signs of AI improving user engagement and advertiser ROI, but he declined to quantify a timeline for when those benefits would show up in the bottom line.

What this means for the broader tech landscape

Meta’s capex jump is another signal that the AI wars are escalating. The company is investing in custom chips to reduce reliance on Nvidia, and it’s building data centers that can handle the massive compute loads required for training large language models. That’s a competitive necessity, but it also creates a rising tide of costs across the sector. If Meta’s stock can’t stomach a $60 billion-plus capex number, investors might similarly punish other tech giants when they report their own spending plans.

For now, the immediate takeaway is that Meta is doubling down on AI as the driver of its next growth phase. Whether that pays off—or whether it becomes another Reality Labs-style money pit—is the billion-dollar question. The stock’s 5% drop suggests the market is hedging its bets. But as any journalist covering this beat will tell you, betting against Zuckerberg’s long-term vision has been a losing game before.

Author Bio:

Ahmed Abed – News journalist covering technology, business, and markets. With a focus on the intersection of corporate strategy and Wall Street, Ahmed has reported on earnings, regulatory shifts, and innovation trends for over a decade. His work appears in leading financial publications and digital news platforms.

Latest

What SaaSpocalypse? Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9 stocks soar as their AI moves deliver earnings beats [Business Insider]

In a tech landscape often painted with broad strokes of doom and gloom over software-as-a-service (SaaS) valuations, a trio of enterprise stalwarts just flipped the script. Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9—three companies that have weathered their fair share of market skepticism—delivered earnings beats that sent their stocks soaring this week. The common thread? A sharp pivot toward artificial intelligence that isn't just a buzzword in a press release, but a tangible driver of customer uptake and revenue growth. Forget the "SaaSpocalypse" narrative for a moment; these results suggest that AI might just be the lifeline the sector needed. Atlassian: The DevOps Darling Gets an AI Upgrade Atlassian, the company behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello, has long been the backbone of developer workflows. But its latest earnings report, released late Wednesday, showed that the company is successfully moving beyond its traditional "self-managed" roots into a cloud-first, AI-...

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...

Jensen Huang is so over the dire predictions of AI leaders like Dario Amodei [Business Insider]

If you’ve spent any time in the tech press over the last six months, you’ve probably seen the headlines. “AI could kill us all.” “The risk of extinction is real.” “We need to pause development.” These warnings, often delivered with the gravitas of a late-night public service announcement, have become a staple of the industry’s public relations diet. The man leading the charge? Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, who has made a second career out of predicting the worst-case scenario for the very technology he is building. But there is another voice in the room, and it isn’t whispering. It’s Jensen Huang, the leather-jacket-clad CEO of Nvidia. And lately, he’s had enough of the doomsday rhetoric. In a series of recent interviews and public appearances, Huang has made it abundantly clear that he is “so over” the dire predictions coming from his fellow AI leaders. He isn’t just disagreeing with them; he’s rolling his eyes in a way that only a man who has seen two decades of tech cycles can. ...

We sold our dream home in the US to move into a rental abroad. Our family has less space, but our lifestyle improved. [Business Insider]

It was the kind of house you see in a real estate catalog and immediately assume belongs to someone else’s life. Four bedrooms, a sprawling backyard with a swing set, a kitchen island big enough to host Thanksgiving dinner, and a mortgage that felt like a second job. My wife, Maria, and I spent five years curating that home. We painted the nursery ourselves, planted the magnolia tree by the driveway, and replaced the carpet with hardwood floors because we believed we were building a legacy. We sold it last spring. Not because we had to. Not because we lost our jobs or fell into debt. We sold it because we realized the house was eating us alive—not financially, but emotionally. We were spending more time maintaining the lawn than lying on it. More weekends fixing the gutters than exploring the city. More energy worrying about resale value than actually living. So we did something that felt terrifying at first, then liberating: we packed two suitcases each, put the rest in storage, a...

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...

After my divorce, I dreaded any type of holiday alone. A group of friends changed that. [Business Insider]

For years, the word “holiday” felt like a trap. After my divorce, the idea of booking a trip alone sent a cold knot into my stomach. It wasn’t the logistics that scared me—I could plan a flight and book a hotel in my sleep. It was the silence. The empty seat next to me at dinner. The awkward look from a waiter when they asked, “Table for one?” I spent two years convincing myself that solo travel was for the brave, and I was not that. I was the guy who stayed home, watching travel documentaries and eating cereal for dinner. Then, something unexpected happened. A group of friends—not close friends, more like familiar faces from a shared hobby—invited me on a long weekend trip to the coast. At first, I said no. The thought of being the “divorced guy” in a group of couples and singles felt like a social minefield. But one of them, a woman named Sarah I barely knew, called me out. “You’re not hiding forever,” she said, half-joking. “Pack a bag. We’ll handle the awkwardness.” I packed that...

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...

Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks You know how these geopolitical standoffs go. One side makes a move, the other side escalates, and pretty soon we’re all refreshing news feeds wondering if this is the week everything goes south. That’s where we are right now with Iran and the United States. Tehran just dropped a statement that’s hard to ignore. Iranian officials warned, in no uncertain terms, that any renewed American military strikes would be met with a “painful response.” Not a measured one. Not a diplomatic note. A painful one. That word choice matters. Let’s be honest—this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this kind of language. Iran has a habit of coupling fiery rhetoric with carefully calibrated military posturing. But what’s different this time? The context. The US has been ramping up pressure in the region, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz and in response to perceived Iranian drone activities. And Iran? It feels...