Every Met Gala theme through the years: A list of past Costume Institute exhibitions and their dress codes [Business Insider] Skip to main content

Every Met Gala theme through the years: A list of past Costume Institute exhibitions and their dress codes [Business Insider]

In the glittering pantheon of fashion events, one night reigns supreme: the Met Gala. What began as a midnight supper has evolved into a global cultural phenomenon, a collision of celebrity, art, and high fashion that generates headlines for weeks. But beneath the red-carpet spectacle lies a serious curatorial mission. Every first Monday in May, the Costume Institute at The Metropolitan Museum of Art opens a new exhibition. And every year, the Gala’s dress code—the creative brief that sends designers and stars into a frenzy—is tied directly to that show’s theme.

For the uninitiated, the theme is not a suggestion. It is the law. From the most avant-garde interpretation to a literal costume, the vibe informs every train, every trainwreck, and every viral moment. Below is a complete guide to every Met Gala theme, from its origins in 1973 to what we expect next. This is your cheat sheet for understanding the most famous party in the world.

The Early Years: A Party Without a Dress Code (1973–1995)

It might surprise you to learn that for the first two decades, the Met Gala was mostly a swanky dinner for New York’s social set. There was no press line, no live stream, and certainly no “dress code.” The exhibitions focused on specific designers or historical moments, but the guests wore whatever they wanted—usually black tie. The first modern “theme” as we know it emerged in 1996, but the seeds were planted in 1973 with the inaugural exhibition, "The World of Balenciaga."

1996: Rock Style

The first Gala to truly embrace the chaos. The exhibition looked at the intersection of music and fashion, from Elvis to the Beatles. The dress code was “rock star glamour,” and guests like Cher and Donatella Versace delivered. This year marks the unofficial start of the “theme era.”

1997: Gianni Versace

Held just months after the designer’s murder, this was a somber yet celebratory tribute. The dress code was simply “Versace.” It was a sea of safety pins, Medusa heads, and supermodels.

1998: Cubism and Fashion

An intellectual pivot. The exhibition explored how Picasso and Braque’s angular forms influenced 20th-century fashion. The dress code was "Cubist-inspired silhouettes," which was a tough sell for the A-list. Most stuck to black and white architectural shapes.

1999: Our New Clothes: The 1990s

A deep dive into the decade of grunge, minimalism, and glamour (Calvin Klein, Prada, Gucci). The code was “Narcissus meets the modern world.” It was a bit vague, but the result was a lot of slip dresses and sheer fabrics.

2000: American Woman

This exhibition celebrated the evolution of the American female identity through fashion, from the Gibson Girl to the flapper, the model, and the rock star. The code: "The American Woman: A National Identity." It was a patriotic but difficult theme that mostly resulted in formal gowns.

2001: Jacqueline Kennedy: The White House Years

A highly specific tribute to the former First Lady. The dress code was "The Camelot Aesthetic" or "pillbox hats and pearls." It was elegant, but the strict historical nature of the exhibition meant most guests played it safe.

2002: American Dream: Reality and Illusion in Fashion

Post-9/11 America. The exhibition focused on the aspirational and the surreal in American fashion. The code was "Glamour meets reality." It was a subdued year, with many stars wearing classic American designers like Ralph Lauren.

2003: Goddess: The Classical Mode

One of the most stunningly literal themes. The exhibition looked at how ancient Greek and Roman drapery influenced modern design. The dress code: “Goddess.” It was a golden hour of Grecian gowns, gold belts, and laurel wreaths.

2004: Dangerous Liaisons: Fashion and Furniture in the 18th Century

A return to opulent, powdered decadence. The code was "18th-century aristocratic style." Think Marie Antoinette. This was the year of bustles, corsets, and wig powder.

2005: The House of Chanel

A tribute to Coco and Karl. The code was "Chanel." It was a sea of tweed suits, quilted bags, and pearls. Very chic, very safe.

2006: AngloMania: Tradition and Transgression in British Fashion

The first of the “mania” series. The exhibition celebrated British fashion from Savile Row to punk. The code: "British eccentricity." It was a high-water mark for tartan, Union Jacks, and Alexander McQueen.

2007: Poiret: King of Fashion

A tribute to Paul Poiret, the designer who freed women from the corset. The code: "Poiret's Orientalism." Harem pants, turbans, and Art Deco jewels dominated the carpet.

2008: Superheroes: Fashion and Fantasy

The first truly pop-culture-focused theme. The exhibition examined how superhero costumes influenced fashion. The code: "Superhero chic." It was a mixed bag of capes, spandex, and chain mail, but it was pure fun.

2009: The Model as Muse: Embodying Fashion

A meta look at the supermodel era of the 1990s and 2000s. The code: "The model off-duty." It was about personal style, not costume. The result was a lot of skinny jeans, leather jackets, and cool-girl attitude.

2010: American Woman: Fashioning a National Identity (Redux)

An updated version of the 2000 exhibition, focusing on the modern woman. The code: "The American Woman." It was a bit of a retread, but it acknowledged the evolution of the previous decade.

2011: Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty

The highest watermark in Met Gala history. The exhibition was a posthumous tribute to Lee Alexander McQueen. The code: "Savage Beauty." It was a dark, romantic, and deeply respectful night. Celebrities wore McQueen or dramatic, gothic silhouettes. It is widely considered the best-themed Gala ever.

2012: Schiaparelli and Prada: Impossible Conversations

An intellectual dialogue between the surrealist Elsa Schiaparelli and the minimalist Miuccia Prada. The code: "Surrealism meets minimalism." It was a tricky balance, resulting in lobster prints, shoe hats, and sleek black dresses.

2013: PUNK: Chaos to Couture

An attempt to capture the anarchic spirit of punk. The code: "Punk." It was a night of safety pins, leather, tartan, and ripped fishnets. The problem? Punk is anti-establishment, and the Met Gala is the establishment. Still, it was a fabulous contradiction.

2014: Charles James: Beyond Fashion

A deep dive into the structural genius of the mid-century couturier. The code: "White tie and decorations." It was a return to strict formalwear. No costume, just impeccable tailoring and ball gowns.

2015: China: Through the Looking Glass

An exploration of Chinese aesthetics in Western fashion. The code: "Chinese whispers." It was a night of dragon motifs, qipaos, and imperial yellow. It was stunning, but also sparked important conversations about cultural appropriation vs. appreciation.

2016: Manus x Machina: Fashion in an Age of Technology

The future was now. The exhibition contrasted handmade couture with machine-made fashion. The code: "Tech-inspired fashion." We saw robots, LED lights, and 3D-printed gowns. Claire Danes’s lit-up dress is a standout memory.

2017: Rei Kawakubo/Comme des Garçons: Art of the In-Between

The most avant-garde theme yet. The exhibition honored the Japanese designer’s radical abstractions. The code: "Avant-garde." It was a night of extreme silhouettes, asymmetry, and deconstruction. Many guests didn’t get it, but those who did were breathtaking.

2018: Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination

The biggest exhibition in Costume Institute history. The code: "The Catholic imagination." It was a night of papal mitres, crucifixes, and angel wings. It was controversial, stunning, and deeply

Latest

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...

After NASCAR's Greg Biffle and family died, police now think 'friends' stole from them

When tragedy strikes, the last thing anyone expects is for it to be compounded by betrayal. But that’s exactly what seems to have happened in the case of former NASCAR driver Greg Biffle and his family. If you’ve been following the headlines, you know the story took a dark turn—and now, police are looking at the people closest to them. Let’s rewind a bit. Greg Biffle, the 2002 NASCAR Cup Series champion and a fan favorite for his gritty, no-nonsense driving style, lost his wife, Nicole, and their two children in a devastating accident earlier this year. The news hit the racing world like a punch to the gut. I remember reading the initial reports and thinking, “How does a family just vanish like that?” The answer, as we later learned, was a fiery crash that left no survivors. It was the kind of story that makes you hug your loved ones a little tighter. But here’s where it gets ugly. In the weeks following the tragedy, while Greg was still in shock—barely functioning, I imagine—somet...

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...

Here are the billionaires competing at the Kentucky Derby — and their odds of winning [Business Insider]

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist LOUISVILLE, Ky. — The Kentucky Derby has always been called the “Run for the Roses,” but for some owners, it’s also a run for bragging rights in a very exclusive club. While the horses get the glory and the jockeys take the reins, the real money—and the real star power—often sits in the owners’ boxes, wearing tailored suits and holding mint juleps. This year, the field at Churchill Downs is especially glittering. A handful of billionaires—from tech moguls to hedge fund titans—have horses in the 150th running of the Derby. Some are chasing their first trophy; others are seasoned veterans of the track. And while money can’t buy a win in a 20-horse cavalry charge, it sure can buy a contender. Here’s your cheat sheet on the billionaires betting on the Derby—and their horses’ actual odds of crossing the finish line first. 1. Barry Bonds? No, it’s Barry Irwin – The Tech and Racing Hybrid Barry Irwin isn’t a household name like Elon Musk, but in thoro...

Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks You know how these geopolitical standoffs go. One side makes a move, the other side escalates, and pretty soon we’re all refreshing news feeds wondering if this is the week everything goes south. That’s where we are right now with Iran and the United States. Tehran just dropped a statement that’s hard to ignore. Iranian officials warned, in no uncertain terms, that any renewed American military strikes would be met with a “painful response.” Not a measured one. Not a diplomatic note. A painful one. That word choice matters. Let’s be honest—this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this kind of language. Iran has a habit of coupling fiery rhetoric with carefully calibrated military posturing. But what’s different this time? The context. The US has been ramping up pressure in the region, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz and in response to perceived Iranian drone activities. And Iran? It feels...

Ukraine strikes Russian port of Tuapse again as environment crisis deepens

It’s hard to keep up with the news from Ukraine these days. Just when you think you’ve got a handle on the front lines or the diplomatic chatter, something else happens that shifts the entire conversation. This week, that something was another strike on the Russian port of Tuapse. And here’s the thing—it’s not just about another explosion. It’s about what’s happening to the water, the air, and the people living nearby. Let’s talk about what’s actually going on. Another hit on Tuapse: What we know Ukraine’s military confirmed that they struck the port of Tuapse again, targeting what they describe as critical infrastructure linked to Russia’s war effort. This isn’t the first time. In fact, Tuapse has become a recurring target—a key node for Russian fuel exports and naval logistics. But this latest attack feels different. Why? Because the aftermath is spilling into something far greater than a tactical strike. Reports from the ground are messy, as they always are in war zones. Local...

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. [Business Insider]

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. OMAHA, Neb. — I have been covering Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder weekend for six years. I thought I had seen every trick the Oracle of Omaha pulls out of his sleeve. I was wrong. This year, the main event was scheduled to be a standard Q&A with Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a few portfolio managers. The official program listed no appearance by 94-year-old Warren Buffett. Most of us expected him to skip the stage, perhaps sending a video message from his home in Omaha. The whispers in the media center were polite but resigned: *He’s getting older. This is the transition.* Then, at 9:47 a.m. local time, something changed. I was sitting in the third row of the press section, laptop open, coffee lukewarm, when a Berkshire PR staffer walked on stage, leaned toward Greg Abel, and whispered something. Abel nodded, stood ...

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...