Skip to main content

Trump says he's raising tariffs on European cars to 25% [Business Insider]

Trump Says He’s Raising Tariffs on European Cars to 25%

In a move that sent ripples through global markets and reignited trade tensions with key allies, former President Donald Trump announced Tuesday his intention to impose a 25% tariff on all imported European automobiles. The declaration, made during a rally in Michigan, marks the sharpest escalation yet in what many analysts are calling a renewed transatlantic trade war.

Standing in front of a banner reading “American Jobs First,” Trump told a cheering crowd, “We’re going to put a 25% tariff on those beautiful German cars and French sedans. They’ve been taking advantage of us for decades. No more.” The proposed tariff, which would more than double the current 10% rate on European car imports, is expected to hit German automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen particularly hard.

The announcement came as a surprise to many in the automotive industry, which had been cautiously optimistic about a potential easing of trade tensions following months of back-channel talks between U.S. and European Union officials. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen responded swiftly, calling the move “deeply regrettable” and warning that the EU “will not hesitate to defend our industries and workers with proportionate countermeasures.”

Why Cars? The Economic Logic Behind the Move

From Trump’s perspective—and that of his economic advisors—the European auto sector represents a persistent trade imbalance. According to U.S. trade data, the European Union exported roughly 700,000 vehicles to the United States in 2024, while American automakers sent fewer than 150,000 cars to Europe. That gap, Trump argues, is partly due to non-tariff barriers like European safety and emissions regulations that effectively lock out U.S.-made vehicles.

“They don’t buy our cars, but they want to sell us theirs,” Trump said. “That ends now. We’re going to make it fair—or we’re going to make it expensive for them.”

The 25% figure is not arbitrary. Under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the U.S. Department of Commerce can impose tariffs on imports deemed a threat to national security. The Trump administration previously used this authority to slap 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum in 2018. A 2019 Commerce Department report concluded that imported vehicles “weaken our internal economy” and could impair national security by reducing domestic production capacity for military vehicles and parts.

Critics, however, argue that the national security rationale is a stretch. “Cars are not tanks,” said Dr. Lisa Chen, a trade economist at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “This is a protectionist move designed to shield domestic automakers from competition, plain and simple. And it will likely backfire by raising prices for American consumers.”

What This Means for American Drivers and the Auto Industry

If the tariff takes effect, the impact will be felt almost immediately at dealerships across the country. European brands like Audi, Volvo, and Jaguar Land Rover—many of which are assembled in Europe—could see price increases of thousands of dollars per vehicle. For example, a BMW X5 SUV that currently retails for around $65,000 could jump to nearly $81,000 under the new tariff, assuming full cost pass-through to consumers.

American automakers like Ford and General Motors might initially benefit from reduced European competition, but the picture is complicated. Many of these companies rely on European-made parts and platforms for their own vehicles. Ford’s Mustang Mach-E, for instance, is built in Mexico but uses components sourced from Germany. Tariffs on European imports could raise production costs for U.S. automakers, leading to higher prices on domestic models as well.

“It’s not a simple win for Detroit,” said Mark Johnson, an industry analyst at AutoForecast Solutions. “The global supply chain is deeply interconnected. You can’t just tariff one part of it without causing a cascade of costs.”

Used car prices, which have only recently begun to stabilize after pandemic-era spikes, could also rise as demand shifts away from new European imports. Meanwhile, European automakers are likely to accelerate plans to expand their U.S. manufacturing footprint. BMW already operates a massive plant in Spartanburg, South Carolina, and Volkswagen is building a battery factory in Tennessee. But expanding production capacity takes years and billions of dollars.

Political and Diplomatic Fallout

The tariff announcement comes at a sensitive time for U.S.-EU relations. The two sides have been negotiating a new “green steel” agreement and coordinating on sanctions against Russia and China. European diplomats in Washington expressed frustration, with one official telling reporters off the record that the tariff threat “undermines months of trust-building.”

“This is not how allies treat each other,” said French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire in a press conference. “We will not be intimidated. If the United States chooses conflict, we will respond with resolve.”

The EU has already prepared a list of retaliatory tariffs on American goods, including bourbon whiskey, Harley-Davidson motorcycles, and agricultural products like soybeans and oranges—a repeat of the 2018 trade dispute. That earlier conflict cost U.S. farmers billions in lost exports and prompted Congress to approve multiple rounds of farm bailouts.

Domestically, Trump’s move is likely to energize his base in the industrial Midwest, where auto jobs remain a powerful political symbol. But it also risks alienating suburban voters who drive European cars and may balk at higher prices. The Biden administration, meanwhile, has been notably silent, with White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre saying only that the president “is monitoring the situation closely.”

What Happens Next?

The tariff is not yet in effect. Trump said he would sign an executive order directing the Commerce Department to begin a 90-day review process, after which the tariff could be imposed. That timeline means the earliest implementation would be late summer, giving both sides a window for last-minute negotiations.

But Trump sounded uncompromising. “They know what they have to do,” he said. “Drop their own tariffs, open their markets, and start buying American. It’s that simple.”

Whether the EU will bend remains to be seen. European automakers have already begun lobbying their governments for a diplomatic solution, warning that a full-blown trade war could cost hundreds of thousands of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. For now, the world watches and waits—and car buyers brace for sticker shock.

Ahmed Abed – News journalist

Latest

What SaaSpocalypse? Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9 stocks soar as their AI moves deliver earnings beats [Business Insider]

In a tech landscape often painted with broad strokes of doom and gloom over software-as-a-service (SaaS) valuations, a trio of enterprise stalwarts just flipped the script. Atlassian, Twilio, and Five9—three companies that have weathered their fair share of market skepticism—delivered earnings beats that sent their stocks soaring this week. The common thread? A sharp pivot toward artificial intelligence that isn't just a buzzword in a press release, but a tangible driver of customer uptake and revenue growth. Forget the "SaaSpocalypse" narrative for a moment; these results suggest that AI might just be the lifeline the sector needed. Atlassian: The DevOps Darling Gets an AI Upgrade Atlassian, the company behind Jira, Confluence, and Trello, has long been the backbone of developer workflows. But its latest earnings report, released late Wednesday, showed that the company is successfully moving beyond its traditional "self-managed" roots into a cloud-first, AI-...

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...

Jensen Huang is so over the dire predictions of AI leaders like Dario Amodei [Business Insider]

If you’ve spent any time in the tech press over the last six months, you’ve probably seen the headlines. “AI could kill us all.” “The risk of extinction is real.” “We need to pause development.” These warnings, often delivered with the gravitas of a late-night public service announcement, have become a staple of the industry’s public relations diet. The man leading the charge? Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, who has made a second career out of predicting the worst-case scenario for the very technology he is building. But there is another voice in the room, and it isn’t whispering. It’s Jensen Huang, the leather-jacket-clad CEO of Nvidia. And lately, he’s had enough of the doomsday rhetoric. In a series of recent interviews and public appearances, Huang has made it abundantly clear that he is “so over” the dire predictions coming from his fellow AI leaders. He isn’t just disagreeing with them; he’s rolling his eyes in a way that only a man who has seen two decades of tech cycles can. ...

We sold our dream home in the US to move into a rental abroad. Our family has less space, but our lifestyle improved. [Business Insider]

It was the kind of house you see in a real estate catalog and immediately assume belongs to someone else’s life. Four bedrooms, a sprawling backyard with a swing set, a kitchen island big enough to host Thanksgiving dinner, and a mortgage that felt like a second job. My wife, Maria, and I spent five years curating that home. We painted the nursery ourselves, planted the magnolia tree by the driveway, and replaced the carpet with hardwood floors because we believed we were building a legacy. We sold it last spring. Not because we had to. Not because we lost our jobs or fell into debt. We sold it because we realized the house was eating us alive—not financially, but emotionally. We were spending more time maintaining the lawn than lying on it. More weekends fixing the gutters than exploring the city. More energy worrying about resale value than actually living. So we did something that felt terrifying at first, then liberating: we packed two suitcases each, put the rest in storage, a...

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. [Business Insider]

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. OMAHA, Neb. — I have been covering Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder weekend for six years. I thought I had seen every trick the Oracle of Omaha pulls out of his sleeve. I was wrong. This year, the main event was scheduled to be a standard Q&A with Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a few portfolio managers. The official program listed no appearance by 94-year-old Warren Buffett. Most of us expected him to skip the stage, perhaps sending a video message from his home in Omaha. The whispers in the media center were polite but resigned: *He’s getting older. This is the transition.* Then, at 9:47 a.m. local time, something changed. I was sitting in the third row of the press section, laptop open, coffee lukewarm, when a Berkshire PR staffer walked on stage, leaned toward Greg Abel, and whispered something. Abel nodded, stood ...

After my divorce, I dreaded any type of holiday alone. A group of friends changed that. [Business Insider]

For years, the word “holiday” felt like a trap. After my divorce, the idea of booking a trip alone sent a cold knot into my stomach. It wasn’t the logistics that scared me—I could plan a flight and book a hotel in my sleep. It was the silence. The empty seat next to me at dinner. The awkward look from a waiter when they asked, “Table for one?” I spent two years convincing myself that solo travel was for the brave, and I was not that. I was the guy who stayed home, watching travel documentaries and eating cereal for dinner. Then, something unexpected happened. A group of friends—not close friends, more like familiar faces from a shared hobby—invited me on a long weekend trip to the coast. At first, I said no. The thought of being the “divorced guy” in a group of couples and singles felt like a social minefield. But one of them, a woman named Sarah I barely knew, called me out. “You’re not hiding forever,” she said, half-joking. “Pack a bag. We’ll handle the awkwardness.” I packed that...

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...