Why digging 12 miles deep is almost impossible [Business Insider] Skip to main content

Why digging 12 miles deep is almost impossible [Business Insider]

The Unseen Frontier: Why Digging 12 Miles Deep Remains Science Fiction

If you’ve ever tried to dig a hole in your backyard for a fence post, you know the frustration of hitting a rock. Now, imagine trying to dig through that rock for 12 miles straight. That’s the equivalent of plunging a drill from the Earth’s surface into the very mantle—a goal that has captivated scientists, engineers, and dreamers for decades.

It sounds simple enough. We have drills, we have steel, and we have the ambition. But the reality is that digging just a few miles into the planet’s crust remains one of the most technically brutal challenges humanity has ever faced. The short answer is: we cannot do it yet. And the reasons why are a sobering lesson in physics, geology, and the limits of modern materials.

The Pressure Problem: A Crushing Reality

The first thing you have to understand is that the Earth is not a hollow ball. It is a dense, layered sphere of solid rock and molten metal. As you go deeper, the weight of the rock above you—what scientists call "overburden pressure"—becomes astronomical.

At 12 miles deep (about 19 kilometers), the pressure is roughly 40,000 times the atmospheric pressure at sea level. To put that in perspective, that is equivalent to the weight of three Eiffel Towers sitting on a single square inch of your drill bit. No ordinary steel can withstand that. Even the strongest alloys used in deep-sea submarines would crumple like aluminum foil under such compression.

This pressure doesn’t just crush your equipment; it alters the rock itself. At those depths, the rock behaves less like a solid and more like a plastic. It flows, creeps, and deforms. A drill bit that works perfectly in the top mile of crust will simply be swallowed or shattered by the surrounding material at deeper levels.

The Heat: Turning Metal to Mush

If the pressure doesn’t get you, the temperature will. Geothermal gradients vary, but as a general rule, the temperature rises about 25°C (45°F) for every kilometer you descend. At 12 miles down, we are talking about 300 to 400 degrees Celsius—over 700 degrees Fahrenheit.

That is hot enough to soften steel, destroy electronics, and cook the lubricants and coolants that drilling rigs rely on. Traditional rotary drill bits, hardened steel and carbide, lose their strength and start to deform at these temperatures. And even if you could get a diamond-tipped bit down there, the heat would degrade the bonding material that holds the diamonds in place.

Scientists have tried to solve this by using high-temperature electronics and exotic cooling systems. But the problem is circular: the deeper you go, the hotter it gets, and the more energy you need to cool the equipment. Eventually, the cooling system itself becomes too large or too inefficient to function.

Drilling Technology: A History of Stopping Short

The deepest hole ever drilled by humans is the Kola Superdeep Borehole in Russia, which reached a depth of 12.3 kilometers (about 7.6 miles) in 1994. That is impressive—but it is only about 60% of the way to our 12-mile target. And even then, the Soviets had to stop. Why? Because the rock at that depth was far less dense than expected, and the temperatures hit over 180°C—far hotter than their instruments could handle.

Since then, no country or company has managed to surpass the Kola record. The technology has improved, but the fundamental barriers remain. The deepest active drilling projects today, such as those used for geothermal energy or scientific research, typically reach only 2 to 3 miles. Anything beyond that requires specialized, multi-billion-dollar equipment that is often experimental.

Why Don’t We Just Use Nuclear Subs or Lasers?

You might have heard about speculative ideas like nuclear-powered drills or super-heated plasma torches. These sound exciting in science fiction, but they face hard engineering limits. A nuclear drill, for instance, would produce massive amounts of heat—making the temperature problem even worse. A laser drill would vaporize rock, but it would also create an enormous amount of molten debris that would immediately refreeze and clog the hole.

And then there is the issue of time. Drilling at a rate of a few meters per hour, even with the best technology, a 12-mile hole would take decades. The cost would run into the hundreds of billions of dollars. For comparison, the entire budget for NASA’s Perseverance rover—which traveled millions of miles to Mars—was about $2.7 billion. Digging 12 miles down would dwarf that.

The Geological Wild Card: Unpredictable Zones

Another major hurdle is that we have no idea what we will find. The Earth’s crust is not a uniform layer. It is fractured, filled with water, gas, and magma chambers. At 12 miles down, you are entering a zone where the crust transitions into the mantle—a region of partially molten rock that is essentially a slow-moving, high-pressure lava flow.

If you hit a pocket of superheated water or gas, it can explode out of the hole with the force of a volcanic eruption. If you hit a magma chamber, your drill is instantly destroyed. We simply do not have the ability to "see" what is down there before we drill, making it a gamble with the highest possible stakes.

What Would It Take?

To realistically dig 12 miles deep, we would need breakthroughs in several areas: materials that can withstand 400°C and 40,000 atmospheres of pressure; novel drilling methods that do not rely on mechanical cutting; and power systems that can operate autonomously in a hostile environment for years.

Some researchers are exploring "self-burrowing" robots that use heat to melt rock and then cool it behind them, creating a glass-lined tunnel. Others are looking at advanced ceramics and diamond composites. But these are still in the laboratory stage.

The Real Question: Why Bother?

Of course, a valid question is why we would want to do this in the first place. The scientific payoff would be enormous—direct access to the Earth’s mantle could unlock secrets about plate tectonics, the origin of life, and even the formation of the solar system. It could also help us find new sources of geothermal energy or rare minerals. But the cost and risk are so high that the world’s governments and private companies have so far chosen to look up, not down.

So, for now, the 12-mile deep hole remains a tantalizing dream. It is not a matter of will—it is a matter of physics. The Earth guards its interior fiercely, and until we invent materials tougher than anything that exists today, we will remain scratching at the surface.

—

Ahmed Abed – News journalist

Latest

China's Commerce Ministry blocks US sanctions against five refineries

When you’re a major global player, you don’t just take a punch—you parry, step back, and sometimes throw one right back. That’s exactly what we’re seeing unfold between China and the United States, and it’s not just another diplomatic spat. This time, it’s personal, and it’s about oil. On a recent Tuesday, China’s Commerce Ministry dropped a statement that felt less like a formal press release and more like a chess move. They’ve officially blocked a set of U.S. sanctions aimed at five Chinese refineries. Let me tell you, reading through the official language, you could almost hear the gears grinding in Beijing. It wasn’t subtle. Now, you might be wondering: why does this matter to anyone outside a boardroom or a policy wonk’s think tank? Well, because these refineries aren’t just random factories. They’re processing Iranian crude oil—a substance that’s been under heavy U.S. sanctions for years. For the average person, this might seem like a distant trade war. But for anyone who’s f...

Trump, Secret Service director say agent at dinner not shot by friendly fire

You know how news cycles work. One minute everyone’s talking about a trade deal, and the next, you’re scrolling through a blur of claims, counterclaims, and grainy footage. This week, that blur has centered on a dinner, a Secret Service agent, and the phrase “friendly fire.” Let’s untangle it. The Incident That Sparked the Questions It started with a dinner. Not just any dinner—an event involving former President Donald Trump and a member of his Secret Service detail. Reports trickled out that an agent had been injured. Immediately, the internet did what it does best: filled in the blanks with speculation. Was it a security breach? An inside job? A rogue bullet? The word “friendly fire” started trending, and suddenly everyone was an expert on ballistics and protocol. I’ll be honest—when I first heard the rumor, my gut clenched. Friendly fire incidents, even in law enforcement, are ugly, messy things. They erode trust. They leave scars that don’t show up on X-rays. So when both Tr...

Sam Altman says Elon Musk can come to his GPT 5.5 party: 'World needs more love' [Business Insider]

In a move that feels more like a Silicon Valley olive branch than a typical tech feud escalation, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has extended an unexpected invitation to his most vocal critic: Elon Musk. The offer? A seat at the table for the upcoming launch of GPT 5.5, the next major iteration of OpenAI’s conversational AI model. “The world needs more love, and honestly, more smart people working on the same problem,” Altman said in a brief interview following a product demonstration in San Francisco. “If Elon wants to come see what we’re building, the door is open. We’re all trying to get to the same future—just maybe taking different roads.” The comment is notable given the frosty history between the two tech billionaires. Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI who left the board in 2018, has since become one of the company’s harshest critics, accusing it of straying from its original nonprofit mission and of prioritizing profit over safety. He has also been building his own rival AI, xAI’s Grok, ...

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. [Business Insider]

I was in the room when Warren Buffett gave a surprise interview at Berkshire's annual conference. The mood swung from excited to gloomy, then hopeful. OMAHA, Neb. — I have been covering Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder weekend for six years. I thought I had seen every trick the Oracle of Omaha pulls out of his sleeve. I was wrong. This year, the main event was scheduled to be a standard Q&A with Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a few portfolio managers. The official program listed no appearance by 94-year-old Warren Buffett. Most of us expected him to skip the stage, perhaps sending a video message from his home in Omaha. The whispers in the media center were polite but resigned: *He’s getting older. This is the transition.* Then, at 9:47 a.m. local time, something changed. I was sitting in the third row of the press section, laptop open, coffee lukewarm, when a Berkshire PR staffer walked on stage, leaned toward Greg Abel, and whispered something. Abel nodded, stood ...

Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist Iran threatens painful response if US renews attacks You know how these geopolitical standoffs go. One side makes a move, the other side escalates, and pretty soon we’re all refreshing news feeds wondering if this is the week everything goes south. That’s where we are right now with Iran and the United States. Tehran just dropped a statement that’s hard to ignore. Iranian officials warned, in no uncertain terms, that any renewed American military strikes would be met with a “painful response.” Not a measured one. Not a diplomatic note. A painful one. That word choice matters. Let’s be honest—this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this kind of language. Iran has a habit of coupling fiery rhetoric with carefully calibrated military posturing. But what’s different this time? The context. The US has been ramping up pressure in the region, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz and in response to perceived Iranian drone activities. And Iran? It feels...

After NASCAR's Greg Biffle and family died, police now think 'friends' stole from them

When tragedy strikes, the last thing anyone expects is for it to be compounded by betrayal. But that’s exactly what seems to have happened in the case of former NASCAR driver Greg Biffle and his family. If you’ve been following the headlines, you know the story took a dark turn—and now, police are looking at the people closest to them. Let’s rewind a bit. Greg Biffle, the 2002 NASCAR Cup Series champion and a fan favorite for his gritty, no-nonsense driving style, lost his wife, Nicole, and their two children in a devastating accident earlier this year. The news hit the racing world like a punch to the gut. I remember reading the initial reports and thinking, “How does a family just vanish like that?” The answer, as we later learned, was a fiery crash that left no survivors. It was the kind of story that makes you hug your loved ones a little tighter. But here’s where it gets ugly. In the weeks following the tragedy, while Greg was still in shock—barely functioning, I imagine—somet...

Berkshire Hathaway's first Q&A without Warren Buffett opened with a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett [Business Insider]

When tens of thousands of shareholders filed into the CHI Health Center in Omaha this past weekend, they knew it would be different. For the first time in over six decades, Warren Buffett was not at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway’s annual meeting. The “Oracle of Omaha” stepped back this year, handing the reins to Vice Chairman Greg Abel and a new generation of leaders. But no one could have predicted the meeting’s very first moment: a question from a deepfake Warren Buffett. The auditorium, packed with investors from around the world, fell into a stunned silence. A large screen flickered to life, displaying a hyper-realistic digital avatar of the 94-year-old billionaire. The avatar, dressed in Buffett’s signature suit and glasses, leaned into an invisible microphone. “Hello, Omaha,” it said in a voice that was uncannily accurate—right down to the Midwestern cadence and the slight crackle of age. “I know I’m not supposed to be here, but I had a few things I wanted to ask Greg about th...

Ukraine strikes Russian port of Tuapse again as environment crisis deepens

It’s hard to keep up with the news from Ukraine these days. Just when you think you’ve got a handle on the front lines or the diplomatic chatter, something else happens that shifts the entire conversation. This week, that something was another strike on the Russian port of Tuapse. And here’s the thing—it’s not just about another explosion. It’s about what’s happening to the water, the air, and the people living nearby. Let’s talk about what’s actually going on. Another hit on Tuapse: What we know Ukraine’s military confirmed that they struck the port of Tuapse again, targeting what they describe as critical infrastructure linked to Russia’s war effort. This isn’t the first time. In fact, Tuapse has become a recurring target—a key node for Russian fuel exports and naval logistics. But this latest attack feels different. Why? Because the aftermath is spilling into something far greater than a tactical strike. Reports from the ground are messy, as they always are in war zones. Local...

Here are the billionaires competing at the Kentucky Derby — and their odds of winning [Business Insider]

By Ahmed Abed – News journalist LOUISVILLE, Ky. — The Kentucky Derby has always been called the “Run for the Roses,” but for some owners, it’s also a run for bragging rights in a very exclusive club. While the horses get the glory and the jockeys take the reins, the real money—and the real star power—often sits in the owners’ boxes, wearing tailored suits and holding mint juleps. This year, the field at Churchill Downs is especially glittering. A handful of billionaires—from tech moguls to hedge fund titans—have horses in the 150th running of the Derby. Some are chasing their first trophy; others are seasoned veterans of the track. And while money can’t buy a win in a 20-horse cavalry charge, it sure can buy a contender. Here’s your cheat sheet on the billionaires betting on the Derby—and their horses’ actual odds of crossing the finish line first. 1. Barry Bonds? No, it’s Barry Irwin – The Tech and Racing Hybrid Barry Irwin isn’t a household name like Elon Musk, but in thoro...

I'm an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. [Business Insider]

I’m an 84-year-old landlord. I charge reduced rent to my housemates who help me with food, tech, and transportation. When I tell people I’m a landlord at 84, they usually picture a grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn. That’s not me. I own a three-bedroom house in Portland, Oregon, that I’ve lived in for 40 years. After my wife passed five years ago, the silence was deafening. I didn’t need the money—I needed company. So I turned to an experiment that’s changed my life: renting out rooms not for the highest dollar, but for help with the stuff that gets harder every year. I call it “assisted living, but on my own terms.” I charge my housemates—two men in their 30s—a reduced rent of $400 each per month. In this market, that’s a steal. But the catch is simple: they help me with three things. Food. Tech. Transportation. Let me break down why this works, how I set it up, and what I’ve learned from living with strangers who became family. Why I ditched the traditional l...